October 2015
|
October 2015 // Volume 53 // Number 5 // Ideas at Work // v53-5iw3
Growing Healthy Kids: A School Enrichment Nutrition Education Program to Promote Healthy Behaviors for Children
Abstract
The Growing Healthy Kids Program is a school-based nutrition education program that teaches students in Kindergarten through 2nd grade about healthy eating, physical activity, and how their body uses food. Pre- and post-knowledge data is collected from the students to measure changes in nutrition knowledge. In the first 2 years of the program, significant improvements in nutrition knowledge were found in all three grades. Teachers reported that students were more aware of the importance of nutrition and were making healthier meal and/or snack choices at the end of the program.
Introduction
Childhood obesity rates have more than doubled in the United States over the last 30 years (CDC, 2013). The "F as in Fat" report (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2009) recognizes the important role schools play in the lives of our nation's families and highlights the critical need for schools to improve their nutrition- and health-related programs. Teaching children the importance of eating healthy and being physically active encourages them to develop and maintain healthy habits throughout their lives.
Physical activity levels and eating behaviors are influenced by environmental factors, including families, community organizations, health care providers, faith-based institutions, businesses, government agencies, the media, and schools (Wechsler, McKenna, Lee, & Dietz, 2004). Well-designed and implemented school programs have potential to promote healthy eating, physical activity, and reduced sedentary time. Also, academic performance may be associated with good nutrition, physical activity, physical education, and nutrition programs (Wechsler et al., 2004). CDC has recommended that schools "implement health education that provides students with the knowledge, attitudes, skills and experiences needed for lifelong healthy eating and physical activity" (Guideline 5) (CDC 2011). Nutrition interventions based on promoting behavior change have proven effective in changing dietary behaviors among children. School-based nutrition interventions have potential to positively affect youth. To be successful, nutrition education programs require a systematic approach that combines knowledge of determinants of behavior with effective strategies and an evaluation plan (Hoelscher, Evan, Pacel, & Kelder, 2002). The objectives of the Growing Healthy Kids through Healthy Communities school enrichment kits (GHK-SEK) program were to improve teacher and student nutrition knowledge and to potentially change their attitudes and behaviors.
Development of the Program
The Growing Healthy Kids through Healthy Communities school enrichment kits (GHK-SEK) were developed by SNAP-Ed Extension educators/assistants and adapted for the GHK-SEK program. The objective was to reach all K-2 grade students with nutrition education to enhance the health curriculum. The GHK-SEK strategy engages teachers to provide direct education through easy-to-use nutrition kits. The kits contain five lessons plus an optional lesson for each of the K-2 grades (Tables 1, 2, and 3). The lessons are based on the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), which emphasizes the role of reinforcement in changing behavior (McKenzie, Neiger, & Thackerary, 2013; Bandura, 2001). For example, in the first grade school enrichment kits, direct reinforcement is used when students receive a special stamp for participating and answering questions correctly during the nutrition lessons. Each lesson meets at least one health standard for Lincoln Public Schools (LPS) and/or the National Health Standards (UNL EdMedia, 2013; CDC, 2013). Tables 1, 2, and 3 provide the learning objective, main topic, SCT constructs, and national standards for each lesson within the curriculum for each grade. Nutrition experts (n=3) reviewed all lessons for accuracy of information and a curriculum specialist reviewed the lessons for age appropriateness and aligning with the National Health Standards. Lessons were revised accordingly. All resources for each lesson are included in the kit.
The kits allow teachers with limited nutrition training to provide accurate and current nutrition information and increase the amount of classroom time spent on health and nutrition. Summer training workshops were held for K-2 teachers. Objectives of the first training were to 1) introduce the teachers to the curriculum, 2) educate them on basic nutrition concepts, and 3) demonstrate how to teach nutrition utilizing the kits. Three 4 hour workshops were conducted; one for each grade level. Workshops allowed the teachers to learn about the lessons and activities included in each kit and how to implement the lessons in their classroom. Pre post-test evaluations were conducted which included knowledge and self-efficacy questions after each workshop and teachers received an evaluation after they implemented the curriculum. In subsequent summer workshops, teachers were educated on the new school lunch guidelines, ways to incorporate physical activity into the classroom, and additional nutrition education resources available to them. Statistical analysis (t-test) was conducted between those who attended the workshop and those who did not. IRB approval was obtained from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the LPS system.
The school enrichment program started with 12 LPS Title I elementary schools, and in 2009 the program expanded to all Title 1 and non-title K-2 grade classrooms in LPS (n=39 schools).
Lesson Topic & Time | Learning Objectives | Activities | SCT Constructs | National Standards |
Introduction (Extension Educator: One, 30-minute activity) |
|
|
|
|
1: Food Guide Adventures (Teacher: Three, 20-minute activities & one 5-minute activity) |
|
|
|
|
2: Fun Food Groups (Teacher: Five, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
3: Mealtime Matters (Teacher: Three, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
4: Healthy Habits (Teacher: Three, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
5: Fantastic Five Senses (Teacher: Three, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
Optional Lesson (Teacher: Two, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
Final Lesson: Snack/Physical Activity (Extension Educator: One, 30-minute activity) |
|
|
|
|
Lesson Topic & Time | Learning Objectives | Activities | SCT Constructs | National Standards |
Introduction (Extension Educator: One, 30-minute activity) |
|
|
|
|
1: Food and Your Body, Part 1, Why My Body Needs Food (Teacher: Three, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
2: Food and Your Body, Part 2, How My Body Uses Food (Teacher: Three, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
3: The 5 Food Groups (Teacher: Three, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
4: What is a Balanced Meal? (Teacher: Three, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
5: Healthy Snacking (Teacher: Three, 20-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
Optional Lesson (Teacher: Five, 10-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
Final Lesson: Snack/Physical Activity (Extension Educator: One, 30-minute activity) |
|
|
|
|
Lesson Title & Time | Learning Objective | Main topics in each Lesson | SCT Constructs | National Standards |
Introduction (Extension Educator: One, 30-minute activity) |
|
|
|
|
1: A Healthy Lifestyle (Teacher: Two, 40-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
2: MyPlate (Teacher: Two, 40-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
3: Plan for Health (Teacher: Two, 40-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
4: Food Variety (Teacher: Two, 30-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
5: Making Choices (Teacher: Two, 40-minute activities) |
|
|
|
|
Optional Lesson (Teacher: One, 30-minute, & One, 10-minute activities |
|
|
|
|
Final Lesson: Snack/Physical Activity (Extension Educator: One, 30-minute activity) |
|
|
|
|
Implementation
The LPS Health Curriculum Specialist assisted with recruiting K-2 teachers within LPS schools (n=18, non-Title 1 schools) to participate, ultimately leading to 100% participation in eligible non-Title I classrooms. At the beginning of each school year, Extension educators scheduled GHK-SEK lesson times with K-2 teachers (n=129).
Once scheduled, an Extension educator delivered the GHK-SEK to the classroom and presented the first lesson on hand washing. During this class, students complete a pre-test to measure their nutrition knowledge. The kit remained in the classroom for 15 days for the teacher to use. The teachers could use the five lessons to enhance the health text used in the school system. After completion of the lessons, a survey was sent to the teacher to complete. The Extension educator returned to teach the final lesson (healthy snacking or physical activity), administer the nutrition knowledge post-test, and pick up the kit.
Evaluation
Matched pre- and post-test data sets from 7,861 K-2 grade students were analyzed by grade group using a paired t-test (significance set at p = 0.05) to evaluate change in nutrition knowledge. Comparing pre- and post-test evaluations was an important step in documenting the impact of the Growing Healthy Kids program (Jayaratne, Bradley, & Driscoll, 2009). Students in each grade were asked a different question(s) based on lesson topics in the GHK-SEK. Questions were based on the evaluation measures for the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-ED) programs (Townsend, Johns, Shilts, & Farfan-Ramires, 2006; Townsend, 2006). The paper-based surveys consisted of one question on selecting an appropriate breakfast item for kindergarteners; two questions on selection of a fruit and vegetable for first graders; and three questions on food group identification for second graders.
A significant increase in nutrition knowledge was found in all three grades in the non-Title I schools (n=18 schools) during the first two years the curriculum was implemented (Vierregger, Albrecht, Hall, Sehi, & Koszewski, 2013) (Table 4). An additional question was added to the Kindergarten and first grade pre post-test in the third year of implementation. Due to the reading level of the students, time to complete the pre post-test is balanced with time to conduct a lesson during the designated teaching time. The most notable increases in nutrition knowledge were in the second grade results, where students' knowledge increased from 58.9% in the pre-test to 81.4%, answering all three questions correctly in the post-test, demonstrating a 22.5% increase in nutrition knowledge in Year 2.
Kindergarten | First Grade | Second Grade | |||||||
Pre-Test | Post-Test | Difference | Pre-Test | Post-Test | Difference | Pre-Test | Post-Test | Difference | |
Year 1 | 89.8% | 94.4% | 4.6%** | 95.6% | 96.9% | 1.3%* | 51.5% | 63.9% | 12.4%** |
Year 2 | 90.2% | 93.6% | 3.4%*** | 96.2% | 97.7% | 1.5%** | 58.9% | 81.4% | 22.5%*** |
*p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001 (two-tailed) |
Teachers completed a Classroom Data form after the 3-week session, including demographic information on students, how much time they spent teaching the GHK curriculum, and lessons used. After using the kits, teachers were emailed a follow-up survey to report on their experience. The survey included their own self-reported health changes; teacher reported student preferences to curriculum activities and efficacy, and outcome expectations. Eighty percent of teachers taught five lessons provided in the GHK curriculum. Most (87%) of the teachers (n =72) who responded (62.5% response rate) to the survey reported they were "more confident in teaching nutrition," and 80% of respondents reported that they "have become more aware of nutrition." Over half of the teacher respondents reported increased physical activity, improved hand washing, and healthier meal and/or snack choices after teaching the curriculum to their students (n= 140) (Hall et al., 2013). Two confidence scales were created for "efficacy expectations" (13 questions) and "outcome expectations" (6 questions) (scale: 1=not at all confident to 4=very confident). The outcome expectations did not have a significant difference between those who attended or did not attend the teacher workshop; however, the efficacy expectations score was significantly higher (p<0.1) for those who attended the workshop.
The most notable change teachers observed in their students was an increased awareness of nutrition. While there was some variation among all three grades, more than half of the teachers who responded to the survey reported students were making healthier meal and/or snack choices and have improved hand washing.
Conclusions and Future Considerations
Significant increases in students' nutrition knowledge were found among all three grades during the first 2 years of the Growing Healthy Kids program. Teachers reported improved confidence in teaching nutrition and increased awareness of nutrition. Teachers also reported that students had an increased awareness of nutrition, were making healthier meal and snack choices, and improved hand washing. Sustainability of the program in the LPS district will be explored with stakeholders. Plans are currently in progress to develop a GHK-SEK handbook for national distribution.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, grant number 2011-67001-30011. Thanks to project collaborators and partners: Curriculum Specialist Marybell Avery, UNL Extension, Lincoln Public Schools.
References
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Adolescent and school health, childhood obesity facts. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/obesity/facts.htm.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Adolescent and school health, national health education standards. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/sher/standards/index.htm.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). School health guidelines to promote healthy eating and physical activity. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/npao/strategies.htm.
Hall, J., Vierregger, A., Koszewski, W., Anderson-Knott, M., & Albrecht, J.A. (2013). Growing healthy kids: K-2 teacher training program. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 45(4S), S84.
Hoelscher, D. M., Evan, A., Pacel, G. S., & Kelder, S. H. (2002). Designing effective nutrition interventions for adolescents. Journal of American Dietetic Association, 102(3), S52-S63.
Jayaratne, K. S. U., Bradley, L. K., & Driscoll, E. A. (2009). Impact evaluation of integrated Extension programs: Lessons learned from the community gardening program. Journal of Extension [On-line], 47(3) Article 3TOT3. Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/2009june/tt3.php
McKenzie, J. F., Neiger, B. L., & Thackerary, R. (2013). Planning, implementing & evaluating health promotion programs: A primer (6th ed.).Glenview, IL: Pearson Education, Inc.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2009). Trust in America's health F as in Fat Report. Retrieved from: http://healthyamericans.org/reports/obesity2009/Obesity2009Report.pdf.
Townsend, M. S., Johns, M., Shilts, M. K., & Farfan-Ramires, L. (2006). Evaluation of a USDA nutrition education program for low-income youth. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 38(1), 30-41.
Townsend, M. S. (2006). Evaluating food stamp nutrition education: Process for development and validation of evaluation measures. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 38(1), 18-24.
UNL EdMedia. (July, 2013). School enrichment kits. Retrieved from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPAYm5nQ3uQ&feature=youtu.be.
Vierregger, A., Albrecht, J., Hall, J. Sehi, N., & Koszewski, W. (2013). Implementations of Growing Healthy Kids School Enrichment Program in Kindergarten-2 Grade. Journal of Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 113(9), A77.
Wechsler, H. McKenna, L. M., Lee, S. M., & Dietz, W. H. (2004). The role of schools in preventing childhood obesity. National Association of State Boards of Education, 4-12.